June 3, 2026
Dark Energy to Replace Foreign Oil
Featured: XOM Catches a Bid as Brent Pushes $100 Again
Editor’s Note: See the following from Joel Litman, Chief Investment Officer and Analyst at Altimetry, whose followers include names at Fidelity, BlackRock, Vanguard, and half of the top 300 money management firms in America. Joel has deep ties to Washington, DC and he’s consulted for the Pentagon, the FBI, the Department of Defense, and has lectured at the US Marine Corps War College. Today he secured access to one of the most heavily guarded areas in the world to uncover the truth about what could soon become the biggest stock market story of the decade.
Dear Reader,
For years, we’ve been told SpaceX is a rocket company… that will one day take humans to Mars (and the moon).
But according to new satellite images from 300 miles above the Earth’s surface, there is something very strange going on at SpaceX right now that has nothing to do with space.
A new division of SpaceX is deploying a new way to power our world… that could replace our need for foreign oil forever – without using nuclear fission, solar, wind, geothermal, coal, or any sort of battery.
When you consider SpaceX burns 29,600 gallons of fuel per launch… it makes sense the business would want a better way to generate energy.
But what it’s doing right now could change not only SpaceX’s operations… but also dramatically affect the entire country – and your investments.
What it’s deploying is a newly permitted technology I know simply as “Dark Energy.”
Most people have no idea something like this is even possible.
And it will sound like science fiction – at first.
But as I prove in my new boots-on-the-ground interview from West Texas, this is the beginning of what could be a $10 trillion boom for investors who know what to do – and who take the right steps now.
SpaceX can’t make this “Dark Energy” by itself. It relies on a small group of little-known suppliers to make it happen.
And I believe that’s why a laundry list of billionaires and tech CEOs are getting themselves into position.
Early supporters of “Dark Energy” include Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, Oracle founder Larry Ellison, and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.
Not to mention names like Brad Gerstner, a legendary tech investor who managed to be early on Uber, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, and Nvidia.
He just joined a $300 million round backing this technology.
Or Garry Tan.
Garry invested in Coinbase back in 2012… turning a $300,000 stake into $2.4 billion in less than 10 years.
He’s backed Airbnb, Stripe, DoorDash, and Dropbox… and his firm has invested in companies that are now worth more than $1 trillion combined.
Today, he’s backing “Dark Energy.”
This discovery could change our daily lives… and radically lower the cost of power.
And I believe that for you, this could be one the most profitable moments of your financial life if you position your money behind the right stocks before this news spreads.
I’m sharing all the details right now, on camera.
Click here to see how you could double your money or more by backing this new “Dark Energy.”
Regards,
Joel Litman
Chief Investment Officer, Altimetry
XOM Catches a Bid as Brent Pushes $100 Again
The ceasefire deal that had crude selling off all of last week? Gone. Overnight, the whole thing unwound, and oil markets moved fast.
What Happened
The tentative ceasefire collapsed after U.S. Central Command reported intercepting Iranian ballistic missiles and drones. The intercepts reportedly occurred over Gulf state airspace, and the immediate read from energy desks was: Strait of Hormuz risk is back on the table, full stop.
Brent crude futures responded in a straight line. Brent is now trading above $97 a barrel, up roughly 5% on the week, and pressing toward the psychologically significant $100 threshold that markets have been watching since hostilities first flared in late February. WTI pushed back above $90 as well, reversing most of the prior week’s ceasefire-driven losses in a single session.
XOM caught an aggressive premarket bid. The stock had been grinding lower for seven straight sessions as the energy complex deflated on peace-deal optimism. That streak is over.
The REAL Reason 2,000 Missiles Rained on Iran
Forget about oil prices.
Forget about everything the evening news has been telling you.
Because after two private meetings with United States Congressmen on March 2nd – and weeks of digging into what those conversations pointed me toward – I’m now convinced we launched those strikes for a completely different reason.
Click here to find out what it is.
If you have even a single dollar invested in the U.S. stock market, what I’ve uncovered is going to directly impact you – starting August 12th.
Discover the real reason here.
The Real Tension Inside This Trade
Here is the part people skip. Exxon is not a clean oil price beneficiary right now. The same conflict driving Brent toward $100 is also the thing that knocked roughly 15% of Exxon’s total production offline. That is not a rounding error.
In Q1 2026, oil and gas output came in 6% lower than Q4 2024 levels, when the company was producing the equivalent of 5 million barrels per day. Assets in Qatar and the UAE accounted for 20% of Exxon’s global output in 2025. Iranian missile strikes damaged two LNG production trains at a Qatar facility Exxon has a partnership stake in, and public reports indicate repairs could take years.
So Exxon is running a genuinely two-sided book here. A prolonged Hormuz closure means higher realized prices on lower volumes. Which effect wins depends entirely on the magnitude of the disruption. Modest price spike with manageable volume loss? Net positive. A deep volume hit that drags production down 15%-plus? That swamps the price benefit, which is exactly what showed up in Q1 earnings.
CEO Darren Woods put it plainly on the Q1 call: the market has not yet absorbed the full impact of this supply disruption. Strategic petroleum reserves have been released and commercial inventories drawn down. One of those relief valves runs dry as the conflict drags on. ExxonMobil Senior Vice President Neil Chapman has separately warned that crude prices could reach $160 per barrel if inventories hit minimum operational levels globally.
The Numbers That Actually Matter
- Brent crude averaged $78.38 per barrel in Q1 2026, up 24% from Q4 2025
- Upstream earnings could get a boost of up to $2.9 billion from elevated prices if volumes hold
- Downstream segment faces a $5.3 billion Q1 headwind, primarily accounting timing effects from oil trading hedges that management says will reverse
- Exxon is targeting 1.8 million boe/d from the Permian in 2026, scaling toward 2 million boe/d by 2027
- Guyana’s Stabroek Block is producing record output exceeding 900,000 gross barrels per day
- $20 billion in share repurchases planned for 2026, matching the full program completed in 2025
- Dividend yield sits near 2.7%, annualized payout of $4.12 per share, with 43 consecutive years of dividend growth
- Deutsche Bank has flagged that a prolonged Hormuz closure could push Brent toward $150 per barrel
The Strait carries roughly one-fifth of global oil and LNG flows daily. The IMO has noted that roughly 20,000 seafarers remain stranded on some 2,000 vessels in the waterway. That is not a statistic that resolves in a week.
Dividend Expert Reveals His Biggest Income Secrets… Free of Charge
Marc Lichtenfeld – Author of the best-selling book Get Rich With Dividends – is giving away his Ultimate Dividend Package…
Free of charge!
Bull, Base, Bear
- Bull: Brent holds above $100, Hormuz disruption persists at a moderate level, Permian and Guyana volumes offset Gulf losses, downstream timing effects reverse in Q2-Q3 as guided. Analysts like Barclays have a $182 price target with an Overweight rating; Bernstein sits at $195.
- Base: Brent oscillates in the $90-$100 band on recurring ceasefire-on/ceasefire-off headlines. XOM grinds sideways with high realized prices partially offset by Gulf volume drag. Dividend and buyback program provide a hard floor.
- Bear: A genuine diplomatic breakthrough reopens Hormuz fully and fast. Brent collapses back toward $75-$80. XOM re-rates sharply lower as the geopolitical premium bleeds out overnight. This is not a hypothetical – it happened in a single session when ceasefire rumors surfaced last month.
The Cheap Investor Scorecard
- Brent above $95: bullish for XOM realizations
- Hormuz transit volumes: watch weekly shipping data as a leading indicator
- Q2 production guidance: does the 750,000 boe/d Gulf output warning from Q1 materialize?
- Downstream earnings reversal: CFO flagged the timing hit as temporary – confirm in Q2 results
- Permian production: 1.8 million boe/d target is the growth anchor independent of geopolitics
- Ceasefire signals: any credible Hormuz reopening is a negative catalyst for the stock, full stop
- Inventory drawdown rate: EIA weekly data will tell you how close the market is to the floor Woods warned about
- Buyback execution: $20 billion program is price support at any reasonable crude level
The 10 AM Trade Pulling Triple-Digit Winners
Stop chasing complicated systems and expensive software. A top trader discovered one repeatable setup that fires almost every morning and has delivered gains of 113% on GOOGL, 240% on META, and more. The Opening Bell Trade Guide breaks it all down and it’s free right now. Don’t wait. We won’t keep it free forever.
Here is where I land on this. XOM is not cheap by historical multiples – the trailing P/E sits around 23x, above sector medians, and the stock has already run hard on the geopolitical premium. What you are really buying here is the crude price with a $4.12 annual dividend attached and one of the cleanest balance sheets in the sector behind it. If Brent holds toward $100 and the Hormuz situation stays unresolved for another quarter, Exxon’s upstream earnings improvement and the downstream timing reversal could make Q2 look materially better than Q1. If a deal gets done and the strait reopens, this stock will move the wrong direction fast – and markets have shown they will not give you time to get out.
The question is not whether Exxon is a good company. It clearly is. The question is how much of that $100 oil you are paying for right now – and whether it stays.
– The Cheap Investor
